As someone else wrote” Dopestrong continued to be a paying client of Dr Ferrari even AFTER the Dr had already been declared a fraud by his own countrys court system, and AFTER it was proven he helped dope dozens of cyclist with EPO”. “In between Tour stages Lance spent hours in the cafeteria all by himself, scratching his head wondering where his teammates and trainers were. Now Lance finds out they were all hiding out injecting EPO and taking blood transfusion”
NewsComment1
Last Year winner Pierre Rolland was 41:57 up the Alpe that would have given him 40th place in 2001…. More aerodynamic bike, better wheels….hhhmmmm
musicNsoccer
Remember crooks Bernie Madhoff, Allen Stanford, and the most recent Russell Wasendorf all pretended to be great philanthropists while they simultaneously cheating all their clients blind. Reminds you any other cheetah?
Fennecfox10
They keep the samples?
musicNsoccer
“This court is not inclined to indulge Armstrong’s desire for publicity, self-aggrandizement or vilification of Defendants, by sifting through 80 mostly unnecessary pages in search of the few kernels of factual material relevant to his claims,” US district judge Sam Sparks said today as he dismissed the doper’s frivolous lawsuit.
musicNsoccer
Dope Strong, Win Wrong, Cheat Long, Arm Prong!
thehitchrules
2 of his team doctors have just been exposed and banned . Why ? Because they orchestrated and maintained a mass cover-up of doping/doping techniques within elite cycling.
Do you get it now ? Com on it really isn’t that difficult .
hasenpfote2727
1:42 the best design for a sunglass ever, 2:20 epic moment
Hereiam7575
What’s interesting is in the end, if they do strip each of his titles, will they also do an investigation on all the 2nd place competitors?
musicNsoccer
Lance Armstrong Faces Grim Endgame as His Doctors Are Banned for Doping (abc news). While the seven-time Tour de France champion maintains that he never used any performance enhancing drugs, official sanctions (lifetime bans) have now been handed down against three men directly linked to Armstrong’s cycling achievements.
musicNsoccer
“This court is not inclined to indulge Armstrong’s desire for publicity, self-aggrandizement or vilification of Defendants, by sifting through 80 mostly unnecessary pages in search of the few kernels of factual material relevant to his claims,” US district judge Sam Sparks said today as he dismissed the doper’s frivolous lawsuit.
philipatoz
Me thinks Lancer was a long-time dope PEDALer!
Yet probably every contender chasing him up the Alps was as well.
marine919
The most tested athlete on the planet and he’s always passed every test at random sites.How was this possible? Now, years later a new test procedure and standard is used to split molecular weights.Will they go back from the present to the year 2000 and retest every rider from the tour using these new new standards ? Lance will be vindicated !
MrASIDS
Cheat !
97pafc
He did dope but everyone did
hellsadore
Have you enough common sense?
DoJ has not doubt about veracity of witnesses, but they cannot arrest Lance Armstrong for doping, that is not a criminal act, that is just a sport offense. That is the main reason of his prosecution by USADA !
DoJ was looking for drugs trafficking and corruption, what they caught was not probably strong enough to convince a court so they dropped the case until they found something better.
nelson4568
he’s a scumbag pompous bastard as an individual, he was given a second chance at life, he had 2 affairs on his first wife the first time she forgave him the second time ended with a divorce, but none of his fan boys like to admit that, so FUCK lance armstrong as a person, who gives a fuck about his career
nelson4568
pussy
wtfdudenotcool101
The Justice Department, did not pursue after a thorough investigation , due in part to the doubt of the veracity of witness testimonies. Yet , here we have a quasi judicial board conducting a trial based upon the same testimonies that Justice would not pursue.
You don’t see anything wrong with that?
thehitchrules
yea it is-. fuck off to another site if the discussion isn’t to your liking.
thehitchrules
EVERY member of his team have testified under oath that they witnessed him dope.
Ten in total . I think even if Armstrong himself stood up and confessed you would still say he didn’t dope. !!
Come on, get in the real world. The game’s up .
hellsadore
Clearly you are not knowing of what you talk.
Lance would not have needed a backdated TUE to clear a negative test! Lance said in Tarbes, before his positive test was announced that he has no TUE, even for EPO, on that TDF
You are confusing point, EPO retrotesting was done according higher scientific levels than UCI reuirement, but because there were no A samples, corrupt UCI refused to prosecute Lance… 6 positives samples is a stronger proof than a A+B samples !
600 tests, BS … just 100!
wtfdudenotcool101
You mean in 1999 when a urine sample showed traces of corticosteroid in an amount that was not in the positive range? So by their own standard he passed. He even had a medical report to show where it came from.
The EPO testing was debunked by many scientists for the improper way it was handled and dismissed.
So out of over 600 tests those are the two instances and this says to you he’s guilty without a doubt? You’re a fucking moron. There is literally no evidence other than hearsay.
hellsadore
Please stop yr BS.
It would have been stupid to use a cream to treat a saddle sore, as testimonied under oath by OReilly, it was a lie.
There is no normal level for EPO use, that is forbidden, and in 1999 there were no EPO tests, but later 6 of his 15 samples were EPO positif, 2 others showed a clear use of EPO.
Testimonies are enough for convince a doper, you should read WADA/USADA and UCI rules! You are confusing criminal court and sport court.
As someone else wrote” Dopestrong continued to be a paying client of Dr Ferrari even AFTER the Dr had already been declared a fraud by his own countrys court system, and AFTER it was proven he helped dope dozens of cyclist with EPO”. “In between Tour stages Lance spent hours in the cafeteria all by himself, scratching his head wondering where his teammates and trainers were. Now Lance finds out they were all hiding out injecting EPO and taking blood transfusion”
Last Year winner Pierre Rolland was 41:57 up the Alpe that would have given him 40th place in 2001…. More aerodynamic bike, better wheels….hhhmmmm
Remember crooks Bernie Madhoff, Allen Stanford, and the most recent Russell Wasendorf all pretended to be great philanthropists while they simultaneously cheating all their clients blind. Reminds you any other cheetah?
They keep the samples?
“This court is not inclined to indulge Armstrong’s desire for publicity, self-aggrandizement or vilification of Defendants, by sifting through 80 mostly unnecessary pages in search of the few kernels of factual material relevant to his claims,” US district judge Sam Sparks said today as he dismissed the doper’s frivolous lawsuit.
Dope Strong, Win Wrong, Cheat Long, Arm Prong!
2 of his team doctors have just been exposed and banned . Why ? Because they orchestrated and maintained a mass cover-up of doping/doping techniques within elite cycling.
Do you get it now ? Com on it really isn’t that difficult .
1:42 the best design for a sunglass ever, 2:20 epic moment
What’s interesting is in the end, if they do strip each of his titles, will they also do an investigation on all the 2nd place competitors?
Lance Armstrong Faces Grim Endgame as His Doctors Are Banned for Doping (abc news). While the seven-time Tour de France champion maintains that he never used any performance enhancing drugs, official sanctions (lifetime bans) have now been handed down against three men directly linked to Armstrong’s cycling achievements.
“This court is not inclined to indulge Armstrong’s desire for publicity, self-aggrandizement or vilification of Defendants, by sifting through 80 mostly unnecessary pages in search of the few kernels of factual material relevant to his claims,” US district judge Sam Sparks said today as he dismissed the doper’s frivolous lawsuit.
Me thinks Lancer was a long-time dope PEDALer!
Yet probably every contender chasing him up the Alps was as well.
The most tested athlete on the planet and he’s always passed every test at random sites.How was this possible? Now, years later a new test procedure and standard is used to split molecular weights.Will they go back from the present to the year 2000 and retest every rider from the tour using these new new standards ? Lance will be vindicated !
Cheat !
He did dope but everyone did
Have you enough common sense?
DoJ has not doubt about veracity of witnesses, but they cannot arrest Lance Armstrong for doping, that is not a criminal act, that is just a sport offense. That is the main reason of his prosecution by USADA !
DoJ was looking for drugs trafficking and corruption, what they caught was not probably strong enough to convince a court so they dropped the case until they found something better.
he’s a scumbag pompous bastard as an individual, he was given a second chance at life, he had 2 affairs on his first wife the first time she forgave him the second time ended with a divorce, but none of his fan boys like to admit that, so FUCK lance armstrong as a person, who gives a fuck about his career
pussy
The Justice Department, did not pursue after a thorough investigation , due in part to the doubt of the veracity of witness testimonies. Yet , here we have a quasi judicial board conducting a trial based upon the same testimonies that Justice would not pursue.
You don’t see anything wrong with that?
yea it is-. fuck off to another site if the discussion isn’t to your liking.
EVERY member of his team have testified under oath that they witnessed him dope.
Ten in total . I think even if Armstrong himself stood up and confessed you would still say he didn’t dope. !!
Come on, get in the real world. The game’s up .
Clearly you are not knowing of what you talk.
Lance would not have needed a backdated TUE to clear a negative test! Lance said in Tarbes, before his positive test was announced that he has no TUE, even for EPO, on that TDF
You are confusing point, EPO retrotesting was done according higher scientific levels than UCI reuirement, but because there were no A samples, corrupt UCI refused to prosecute Lance… 6 positives samples is a stronger proof than a A+B samples !
600 tests, BS … just 100!
You mean in 1999 when a urine sample showed traces of corticosteroid in an amount that was not in the positive range? So by their own standard he passed. He even had a medical report to show where it came from.
The EPO testing was debunked by many scientists for the improper way it was handled and dismissed.
So out of over 600 tests those are the two instances and this says to you he’s guilty without a doubt? You’re a fucking moron. There is literally no evidence other than hearsay.
Please stop yr BS.
It would have been stupid to use a cream to treat a saddle sore, as testimonied under oath by OReilly, it was a lie.
There is no normal level for EPO use, that is forbidden, and in 1999 there were no EPO tests, but later 6 of his 15 samples were EPO positif, 2 others showed a clear use of EPO.
Testimonies are enough for convince a doper, you should read WADA/USADA and UCI rules! You are confusing criminal court and sport court.