25 Comments

  1. Lance Armstrong Faces Grim Endgame as His Doctors Are Banned for Doping (abc news). While the seven-time Tour de France champion maintains that he never used any performance enhancing drugs, official sanctions (lifetime bans) have now been handed down against three men directly linked to Armstrong’s cycling achievements.

  2. “This court is not inclined to indulge Armstrong’s desire for publicity, self-aggrandizement or vilification of Defendants, by sifting through 80 mostly unnecessary pages in search of the few kernels of factual material relevant to his claims,” US district judge Sam Sparks said today as he dismissed the doper’s frivolous lawsuit.

  3. iLivOnYooTube

    he took over 500 drug tests and it is hard for me to believe that he doped with drugs and got away with that many drug tests

  4. You call americans cheating yank’s, you don’t know yankee doodle doo !!!! Only the french would make a comment like that… proud to be an american 🙂

  5. These allegations are based on stuff from a decade ago! Give it a rest! Everybody in the peloton dopes, so it was a fair playing field. The now-apparent-jackass USADA runs on taxpayer dollars, and those dollars would be much better spent on something other than this witch hunt.

  6. Damn if he doped shit goodbye to all your tour de france u won u passed all those test but mayb he used something to throw it off and pass the tests

  7. ING STEROIDS THEN WHATEVER LANCE WAS DOING TO PASS DRUG TESTS

    THAT WOULD BE SERIOUSLY DAMAGING. AND IF TRUE LANCE SHOULD BE — WELL — LIKE A jamie dimon AND SHOULD PERMANENTLY BE BANNED FROM ANY SPORT

    IF — AND I DONT THINK WE’LL EVER KNOW — LANCE TRULY DOPED IF I HAD TO BET I’D SAY THEY’RE DOING THE SAME THING IN FOOTBALL AND SOME IN BASEBALL AND SOME IN BASKETBALL AND PROBABLY A BIT MORE IN SOCCER

    jamie dimon tHIS LOSER IS LITERALLY LIKE lance + USING CONCILIATORY METHODS TO MASK DOPING

  8. DEMONSTRATES THAT I NEVER DUPED”
    OK FINE

    BUT THIS ONE SEEMS TO BE DIFFERENT BC IT’S SAYING: “YEAH WELL WE FOUND TRACES IN YOUR BLOOD THAT WOULD SUGGEST THAT YOU’VE BEEN TAKING SOMETHING TO ALTER YOUR BLOOD IN A WAY THAT CONCEALS YOUR DOPING FROM BEING DETECTED”

    THAT SOUNDS — AND AGAIN HE COULD BE RIGHT AND THEY WRONG — BUT IT SOUNDS CREDIBLE.

    IF THAT IS TRUE THE SHOCKWAVES SHOULD BE FELT IN THE ENTIRE SPORTS INDUSTRY BC IF HE’S DOING IT IMAGINE OTHERS WHO ARE DOING IT I.E FOOTBALL I.E TAK

  9. LIKE TAKING A RANDOM PERSON NOT ON WALL STREET AND MAKING HIM ceo OF A PLACE THAT REQUIRES 0 SKILL AND 100% HOW TO EXPLOIT LOOPHOLES. IF HE AT LEAST HAD LIKE M&A, STRUCTURED/LEVERAGED FINANCE/ INSTITUTIONAL TRADING/ETC. EXPERIENCE THAT’D BE ONE THING BUT EVERYTHING I MENTIONED

    PLUSSSS

    0 CORPORATE FINANCE EXPERIENCE = A PROBLEM

    I DON’T WANNA DIVULGE IN A DOUCHEBAG RIGHT NOW

    OK-

    WHAT’S INTERESTING WITH THIS LANCE CASE IS THIS:

    LANCE’S MAIN ARGUMENT IS: “I HAD 500 DRUG TESTS ALL OF WHICH

  10. n

    WHAT EXACTLY DOES HE KNOW HOW TO DO? SERIOUSLY. SO IN NIKE YOU NEED TO LOOK AT ALL THESE THINGS; AT jpmorgan chase YOU DOOOOOO… WHAT? YOU DO WHAT? FIND OUT HOW TO EXPLOIT FEDERAL REGULATION LOOPHOLES? HOW TO THROW CURVEBALLS IN THE FORM OF OVERDRAFT FEES?

    THERE IS NO SUBSTANCE TO THIS LOSER juamie dimon. UNLIKE REPUTABLE (AND 0 DISCIPLINARYA CTIONS) CEOs LIKE MR. PANDIT, MR. BLANKFEIN, MR. SCHWARZMAN, ETC. ETC.

    THIS LOSER jamie HAS 0 OK? 0 CORPORATE FINANCE EXPERIENCE. SO ITS LITERALLY

  11. L ANALOGY — AND THIS IS UNLIKE LANCE IN THE SENSE THAT IT’S OPENLY A FACT — IS THIS LOSER jamie dimon. EXTREME UNFAIR ADVANTAGES I’M NOT EVEN GOING TO START LISTING THEM. THIS LOSER DOES NOT COMPETE FAIRLY AND ON A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD. I SEE NEWS SOMETIMES OF REAL COMPANIES LIKE APPLE OR NIKE — THESE COMPANIES AND EXECUTIVES ACTUALLY NEED SKILL AT WHAT THEY DO — FROM PRODUCTS, TO PRICING, TO ENTERING CERTAIN SEGMENTS IN THE WORLD, TO R&D, MARKETING U NAME IT

    LOOK AT THIS LOSER jamie dimo

  12. STANDARD NEWS IS A MOVE UP BUT SHE’S STILL FUGLY RETARDED AND USELESS

    OK-

    IN TERMS OF lance armstrong, I DON’T WANT 2 CONDEMN HIM, BUT I HAVE A STRONG STRONG FEELING THAT HE WAS DOPING/CHEATING. IMAGINE IF YOU WERE THE 2ND PLACE GUY AND YOU DID NOT DOPE. HOW DO U THINK THAT WOULD MAKE YOU FEEL? LANCE — IF CHEATING — SHOULD BE LIKE PERMANENTLY CONDEMNED BC IF YOU STRIPPED AWAY HIS DOPING HE WOULD BE LIKE LAST PLACE. CHEATING LIKE THAT UNDERMINES THE INTEGRITY OF THE GAME

    A PERFECT PARALLE

  13. COULDN’T TAKE IT/ETC.ETC.

    BUT IN THE VAST MAJORITY OF CASES THEY HAVE 0 LICENSES (IE SECURITIES) AND 0 EXPERIENCE

    SO YOU’RE FULL OF SHIT AND YOU’RE LIKE A SUB-

    I LIKE THIS I JUST THOUGHT OF THIS WHILE TYPING:

    ‘A SUB-DEPARTMENT’ WITHIN TELEPROMPTER READERS

    YOU LOOK AT ALL THE — AND I HATE TO SAY THIS BC TELEPROMPTER READERS R JUST THAT: TRs — “:egendary newscasters” THE ONES WHO PASSED AWAY AND SHIT AND THEY’RE ALL REGULAR news ppl

    SO UGLY RATFACE GOING FROM “business news” (SUB-DEPT) 2

  14. WHO IS THE HIGHEST business news person? 2 B SPECIFIC WE’RE TALKING ABOUT cnbs AND bloomberg (ONLY 2)

    0. NO ONE IDENTIFIABLE. A “business news teleprompter reader” IS MORE FULL OF SHIT THAN A STANDARD TELEPROMTPER READER BC HE/SHE ACTS LIKE — TO GO BACK TO MY PERFECT ANALOGY — SOMEONE EXTREMELY OUT OF SHAPE WHO NEVER SWUNG A GOLF CLUB IN HIS/HER LIFE WHO TRIES TO ACT LIKE TIGER WOODS IT DOESN’T WORK LIKE THAT. 0 EXPERIENCE AND IF IT DOES EXIST 100% OF THE TIME THEY’RE FUCK UPS/BURNOUTS/

  15. OATING ANYTHJING, THAT IS YOUR JOB DESCRIPTION. 0 LICENSES, 0 ENTRY EXAMS, ETC. ETC.

    5 10 15 20 25 30 YEARS LATER, YOUR JOB DESCRIPTION IS

    EXACTLY
    THE
    SAME

    “READS TELEPROMPTERS. ASKS QUESTIONS TO CARRY CONVERSATIONS. SITS IN A MAKEUP ROOM.”

    IN THAT REGARD, ONE CAN SAY WITH PRECISION THAT IT IS INDEED A DEAD-END JOB DON’T LOOK AT ME LIKE YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT THE FUCK I’M TALKING ABOUT OR THAT I’M MAKING SHIT UP BC U KNOW THIS IS THE TRUTH

    NOW,

    TAKE A LOOK AT “business news” AND OTHER news

  16. OF THIS REVOLVING DOOR

    SO WHY PUT SOMEONE FUGLIER THAN cambell (erin ratface) TO READ TELEPROMTPERS? IT MAKES 0 SENSE

    … I LOST MY TRAIN OF THOUGHT LOL

    O YEAH

    FROM HER PERSPECTIVE SHE MADE AN UPWARD MOVE AND HERE’S WHY:

    IM NOT GUNNA TYPE ENDLESSLY TO DELIVER THE FULL PICTURE SO I’LL GO AT IT FROM ONE ANGLE: IF YOU LOOK AT THE TELEPROMPTER READER INDUSTRY, IT IS A DEAD-END JOB. YOUR JOB DESCRIPTION IS “READS TELEPROMPTERS. SITS IN A MAKEUP ROOM. ASKS QUESTIONS.” IF YOU’RE NOT SUGARC

  17. RUNNING A TELEPROMPTER READER INDUSTRY IS VERY VERY EASY:

    HUMAN CAPITAL

    IS 90% OF THE GAME. THE PERSON YOU PUT IN FRONT OF THAT CAMERA TO READ TELEPROMTPERS IS 90%. IS THE PERSON UGLY? IS THE PERSON MEDIOCRE? GOOD LOOKING? HOT?

    YOU SHOULD SETTLE FOR VERY VERY HOT — O N L Y VERY VERY HOT. 99-

    OK FINE-
    70% OF THE POPULATION CAN READ ENGLISH OFF A TELEPROMPTER

    MAYBE 1% IS ‘VERY VERY HOT’

    SO, TO PUT AN UGLY RATFACE LIKE erin IS LIKE “WTF R U DOING?”

    B4 HER WAS cambell WHO WAS A PART

  18. LETS GET THSI OUTTA THE WAY FIRST:

    I WATCHED cnn FOR 5 MINS AND ITS ASTONISHING HOW THIS UGLY RATFACE erin IS STILL THERE

Comments are closed.